Diary
link_blog.gif

« Previous Entry | Main Diary | Next Entry »

03.14.06 01:52 PM

double standards for whites and blacks running for office?

ok, so someone just sent me this link in the daily news...

B'klyn race no place for ex-abuser

Tha main topic of this piece being: "Kevin Powell, a candidate for Congress in Brooklyn who describes himself as "a recovering misogynist" with a history of physically abusing women, a variation on that question must be asked."

Anyway, from what I gather, the writer is saying that Kevin Powell is not a good or qualified candidate because he is human. It appears that Jimi Izrael feels the same way about Powell. To be human is to err. Powell has written extensively in articles and books about some of the many incidents discussed in both the Daily News and on Izrael's blog.

It's not that I don't care about some of the things discussed that Powell has done. I do care - and feel that those issues should be addressed. My main problem with black male writers taking this view and outing Powell in this way, well, is that it's counterproductive. I'm not on some black folks shouldn't air other black folks dirty laundry in public either - what I'm getting at is that it seems like there is a double standard at play here.

How many white elected officials and candidates have had similar issues? Does that sway our view of thier ability to hold office? And before you answer, remember that black folks loved themselves some William Jefferson Clinton.

tags: |

posted by lynne | | AddThis Social Bookmark Button

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.lynnedjohnson.com/cgi-bin/pingit.cgi/700

Comments

It's funny because I remember reading Powell's essays and being surprised at his violations against women, yet I believe that part of him is history. I'm not saying that he doesn't have those same tendencies, yet his current character and demeanor provide us with a glimpshot that although he WAS physically abusive, I'm not sure the same is true now. I rather much use this argument in defense of him rather than pointing out the wrongdoing that THEY do, because we know things aren't equal and even so as a self-described hip-hop self-taught feminist, I wouldn't openly champion any man that was physically oppressive to women.

posted by msjulala | March 14, 2006 3:02 PM #

I have so many issues with this issue that its hard to keep my thoughts organized, so if this comes out jumbled, i apologize in advance...

People are such hypocrites. As much as folks complain about how politicians lie and you can't trust them, they fake etc, here you have a man who's laying it all out bare and he can't get a break. He's saying "i'm flawed but i've made progress in my self-development and imma keep on"...he wants to help others and seems to have dedicated his life to some degree to 'giving back'. But that ain't good enough for folks. But the same folks that are complaining and dissing him ain't tryin to do what he's doin...

fukkouttaherewiththatbullshit, as the kids say...

posted by Veronica | March 14, 2006 4:14 PM #

Doesn't that happen in politics all the time?

People were on G-Dub for his military record, his drunken ways in the 70's... and that was 30 some years ago.

If you're running for public office, prepare for your dirty laundry to be aired.

And, some people just don't like Kevin Powell. jimi izrael is one of them cats. It's not about black folks airing another person's laundry... there's a lot of people who just don't like dude.

posted by Quibian 'Q' Salazar-Moreno [TypeKey Profile Page] | March 14, 2006 4:20 PM #

My concerns about Kevin are in no way personal---I think I have said it very publicly, Q: I got alot of love for him. We've had our beefs and I'm not buying what he's selling, but I would never prevent him from selling it. Kevin and I have issues that are more about our world veiws than personal. I have a low tolerance for people selling easy answers. I have a low tolerance for people macking off a Mea Culpa. And let's face it--using reality television as a springboard into politics is a bad look. He lacks qualifications. Any qualifications whatsoever. That's my beef

posted by jimi | March 14, 2006 9:38 PM #

The other thing is that--c'mon---it's one thing to have a drinking problem (Bush) or like getting your Duck Sick (Clinton). When your anger problems cause you to act out in public and physically attack people, we can argue that a life in politics may not be your bag. This ain't Inochina, where there duke it out on the floor of Senate. You attack another congressman here, and it'll get real hot where you are, real quick. It would be oe thing if dude was some kind of political wunderkind. But he's not. it feels more like another hustle than anything. Square biz.

posted by jimi | March 15, 2006 9:21 AM #

people are allowed to change themselves, improve themselves. i've had issues with mr. powell for years. however, a large number of african americans seemingly are more willing to give their approval to white leaders (Bill Clinton) and offer more scrutiny to their own kind.

on the flip side... kevin still comes off as 'angry black man' to me. even in his attempts to reform. i dunno...

posted by critic | March 15, 2006 4:29 PM #

i agree, i'm not buying what kevin's selling either. i read the memoir of former vibe editor miles marshall lewis, where he talked about kevin attacking him and knox robinson from the fader. a lot of dudes just don't like him, yet for pretty solid reasons. it seems like touré jacked the hip hop baldwin spot he was after, and politics is his next hustle. but i thought he was starting a record label too? whatever works, right?

posted by punch | March 15, 2006 5:38 PM #

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved before your comment will appear.)





 

This weblog is powered by Movable Type 3.3 and licensed under a Creative Commons License.